Instagram Facebook-f Search-location
Book Assessment
Book Assessment
Instagram Facebook-f Search-location
Book Assessment
Instagram Facebook-f Search-location

Our Archive

Welcom to our archive

childhood apraxia speech therapy

Childhood Apraxia of Speech: Signs, Diagnosis, and Therapy

Written for Nivera Child Development Centre by the Speech-Language Pathology Team Reviewed by: Speech & Language Therapy Division, Nivera CDC, Kumbalam, Ernakulam This guide reflects how our speech-language pathologists assess and plan therapy for children with suspected motor speech difficulties. Childhood apraxia of speech (CAS) is a motor speech disorder in which a child knows what they want to say but has difficulty planning and coordinating the precise movements of the lips, tongue, and jaw needed to say it. It is not caused by weak muscles, low intelligence, or a lack of effort, and it does not usually resolve on its own. For parents in Kochi who have watched a child struggle to get words out, the label can bring both relief and worry. This guide explains what CAS is, how to recognise it, how it differs from other speech delays, and what therapy actually helps. Signs of Apraxia of Speech in Children No single sign confirms CAS, and diagnosis rests on a pattern of features assessed by a speech-language pathologist. Common signs parents notice include: Very limited babbling in infancy. Some children with CAS babble little, or produce few different sounds, in the first year. Late first words and a small vocabulary. Words may come well after the typical age, and progress can feel slow or stop-start. Inconsistent errors. The same word is pronounced differently on different attempts, which is one of the key features separating CAS from simpler sound delays. Difficulty with longer words and phrases. A child may manage a short word like “ba” but struggle badly with “banana” or a two-word phrase. Groping movements. You may see the child visibly searching with their mouth, jaw, or tongue before a sound comes out. Vowel distortions. Vowels may sound unusual or change from one attempt to the next. Unusual rhythm or stress. Speech can sound choppy, flat, or oddly stressed, with equal emphasis on every syllable. Understanding is better than speaking. The child follows instructions and understands conversation far better than they can express themselves, and may become frustrated as a result. Speech is harder to understand as sentences get longer. Familiar listeners may manage single words, while strangers understand very little. CAS vs. Other Speech Difficulties Parents are often told their child is “just a late talker,” and many late talkers do catch up. CAS is different, and telling them apart matters because the treatment differs. Late talker or typical speech delay. Speech is delayed but follows the usual developmental pattern and often catches up with time and general language support. Articulation or phonological disorder. Errors are usually consistent and rule-based, for example always replacing one sound with another, rather than varying from attempt to attempt. Dysarthria. Speech is affected by muscle weakness or poor muscle control, often with changes in voice quality and breath support, and usually linked to a neurological condition. Language disorder. The difficulty lies in understanding or using words and grammar, not in the motor planning of speech. Some children have more than one of these at the same time, which is why a full assessment matters. What Causes CAS? In many children no single cause is found. CAS may be linked to differences in how the brain’s speech-motor pathways develop, and in some cases it is associated with a genetic condition, a neurological condition, or other developmental disorders such as autism or a language disorder. Parents did nothing to cause it, and it is not the result of how a child was spoken to or raised. How Is Apraxia of Speech Diagnosed? The strategies that help an ordinary picky eater — offering repeated small exposures to new foods without pressure, involving children in food preparation, maintaining a relaxed mealtime atmosphere — are genuinely useful but are often not enough on their own for a child with a true sensory feeding issue. Sensory-based feeding problems typically need a structured occupational therapy approach that works specifically with the child’s sensory system, gradually building tolerance through a carefully sequenced process rather than general encouragement. Treating a sensory feeding issue as simple pickiness, and relying only on pressure or willpower-based strategies (“just try a bite”), often backfires, increasing anxiety around food and making the pattern more entrenched rather than better. What Parents Can Do at Home CAS is diagnosed by a qualified speech-language pathologist, often in consultation with a paediatrician or developmental specialist. There is no single test. The assessment typically includes: Detailed history. Early babbling, feeding, first words, family history, and the child’s overall development. Oral-motor examination. Checking the structure and movement of the lips, tongue, jaw, and palate. Speech sampling. Listening to the child say single words, longer words, and phrases, looking for inconsistency, groping, and prosody differences. Language and hearing checks. Ruling out hearing loss and examining how well the child understands and uses language. Observation of how speech changes with complexity. Watching whether errors increase as words get longer or sounds are combined in new ways. A firm diagnosis is often easier from around age three, when children can complete more of the tasks, but early signs can be spotted much sooner. Therapy should not wait for a final label. If your child shows these signs, starting support early is better than waiting. Therapy for Childhood Apraxia of Speech Because CAS is a motor planning problem, the most effective therapy is motor-based. It focuses on practising the movements of speech again and again, rather than only talking about sounds or playing language games. Speech-language pathologists draw on several well-established approaches, chosen to suit each child: Frequent, intensive practice. Children with CAS generally need more frequent sessions than children with simple sound delays, often with shorter, focused sessions several times a week, plus daily practice at home. One-to-one sessions. Individual therapy allows the therapist to give the precise, repeated feedback the child needs. Cueing and prompting techniques. Therapists use touch, visual, and verbal cues to guide the child’s mouth through each movement, then gradually reduce support as the child gains control. Building
Read More
Parent discussing a child's therapy schedule and treatment plan with a therapist at a child development center.

How Many Therapy Sessions Does My Child Actually Need?

Written for Nivera Child Development Centre by the Clinical Therapy Team Reviewed by: Speech, Occupational & Behavioral Therapy Division, Nivera CDC, Kumbalam, Ernakulam Session-frequency recommendations below reflect how our multidisciplinary team actually plans and reviews therapy caseloads for children at Nivera CDC.Updated 30 September  2026 It’s one of the first questions almost every parent asks after a diagnosis or assessment: how many sessions a week does my child actually need? The honest answer is that there is no single number that applies to every child — frequency depends on the specific therapy type, the severity of the challenge, the child’s age, and how they respond over time. What we can offer, based on how our multidisciplinary team plans caseloads at Nivera Child Development Centre, is a clear picture of how these decisions are actually made, along with the general ranges most children fall into for speech, occupational, and behavioral therapy. Why There’s No Universal Answer Therapy frequency is never a fixed prescription applied uniformly across every child with a similar diagnosis. Two children with the same diagnosis — say, a speech delay or autism spectrum disorder — can need very different session frequencies depending on how significant the delay is, how the child responds to intervention, how much practice happens at home between sessions, and what other therapies or school-based supports are already part of their routine. This is why a proper assessment, not a diagnosis label alone, should always be what determines the starting frequency. Factors That Determine Session Frequency Severity of the delay or condition. A mild articulation issue may need far fewer sessions than a significant global developmental delay affecting multiple areas of functioning. Severity is typically measured through standardised assessments during the initial evaluation. The child’s age. Younger children, particularly under age five, often benefit from more intensive early intervention, since this period of rapid brain development offers a strong window for building foundational skills. Frequency for a two-year-old with a significant delay often looks different from a similar recommendation for an eight-year-old. Type of therapy needed. Speech therapy, occupational therapy, and behavioral therapy (such as ABA) each have different typical intensity patterns based on research and clinical practice, which we outline in more detail below. Rate of progress. A child who is progressing steadily may need less frequent sessions over time, while a child who is progressing slowly, or has plateaued, may benefit from a temporary increase in frequency to address a specific skill more intensively. Home carryover. Children whose parents are able to consistently practice recommended strategies and exercises between sessions often need fewer in-clinic sessions to achieve the same progress as a child without much practice at home. Co-occurring needs. A child receiving speech therapy, occupational therapy, and behavioral therapy simultaneously will have a different overall weekly therapy load than a child working on a single, isolated area, and therapists coordinate across disciplines to avoid overwhelming the child’s schedule. Family logistics and capacity. While clinical need is the primary driver, a realistic therapy plan also considers what a family can sustainably manage in terms of travel, cost, and scheduling — a plan a family can’t maintain long-term is less effective than a slightly less intensive one they can follow consistently. Typical Session Frequency by Therapy Type Speech and language therapy. Most children with speech or language delays start with one to three sessions per week. Milder articulation issues may need just one weekly session, while more significant language delays, apraxia of speech, or minimal verbal communication often benefit from two to three sessions weekly, especially in the early stages of intervention. Occupational therapy. Typical recommendations range from one to three sessions per week, depending on whether the focus is a specific, contained skill (like handwriting or a single sensory concern) or broader sensory processing, motor planning, and daily living skill challenges that benefit from more frequent, consistent input. Behavioral therapy (including ABA-based approaches). Behavioral intervention intensity varies more widely than other therapy types, ranging from a few hours a week for more targeted behavioural goals to significantly more intensive programmes for young children with autism spectrum disorder, where research has generally supported higher-intensity early intervention. The exact recommended hours should always come from an individualised assessment rather than a fixed general number. Combined or multidisciplinary programmes. Many children benefit from a coordinated combination of therapies rather than one in isolation. In these cases, the team looks at total weekly therapy load holistically, balancing intensity across disciplines with the child’s stamina, school schedule, and family capacity. Why More Sessions Isn’t Always Better It’s a natural instinct to assume that more therapy must always lead to faster progress, but this isn’t consistently true. Children need time to consolidate and practice new skills between sessions, and overly intensive schedules — especially for very young children — can lead to fatigue, reduced engagement, and diminishing returns rather than accelerated progress. A good therapy plan balances intensity with the child’s capacity to absorb and practice what’s being taught, and a slightly lower frequency with strong home carryover often outperforms a higher frequency with an exhausted, disengaged child. How Nivera CDC Decides and Reviews Session Frequency A comprehensive initial assessment. Before recommending any frequency, our therapists conduct a detailed evaluation of the child’s current skills, the specific areas of concern, and relevant developmental history, rather than basing recommendations on diagnosis alone. An individualised starting recommendation. Based on the assessment, our team recommends a starting frequency tailored to the child’s specific needs, explained clearly to parents along with the reasoning behind it. Regular progress reviews. We reassess progress at regular intervals — typically every four to eight weeks depending on the therapy type — and adjust frequency up or down based on how the child is actually responding, not on a fixed, unchanging schedule. Coordination across disciplines. For children receiving more than one type of therapy, our team coordinates scheduling and goals across speech, occupational, and behavioral therapists to ensure the overall plan is cohesive and realistic rather than
Read More
South Indian preschool girl with selective mutism standing quietly in a classroom while comfortably communicating during pediatric therapy, illustrating early signs and treatment of selective mutism in children.

Selective Mutism in Children: Signs and Treatment Options

By Nivera Child Development Centre | Kumbalam, Kochi, Kerala Reviewed by our child development specialists and an Behavior Therapist, Physiotherapist | Updated 03 September  2026 A child who chatters non-stop at home but goes completely silent at school, at a relative’s house, or around unfamiliar adults can be confusing and worrying for parents. Is it shyness? Stubbornness? Something more? For a small number of children, this pattern points to selective mutism — a recognised anxiety condition, not a behavioural choice. This guide explains what selective mutism actually is, how to tell it apart from ordinary shyness, and what treatment options genuinely help children find their voice in every setting. What Is Selective Mutism? Selective mutism is an anxiety disorder in which a child who is fully capable of speaking, and who does speak comfortably in certain settings (usually at home with immediate family), consistently fails to speak in other specific settings, most commonly school, unfamiliar social situations, or around people outside their close family circle. It is not a communication disorder in the sense of a speech or language delay — the child has the words and the ability to speak, but intense anxiety in certain environments makes speaking feel physically impossible in that moment. Selective mutism typically first becomes noticeable between ages three and five, often around the time a child starts preschool or school, though it is sometimes only recognised later once a pattern becomes clearly established. Selective Mutism vs. Shyness: What’s the Difference? Nearly every child feels shy or hesitant in new situations at some point, which makes it easy for selective mutism to be dismissed as “just being shy” for months or years before it’s properly recognised. A few key differences help distinguish the two. Duration and consistency. A shy child typically warms up after some time in a new setting — minutes, an hour, a few visits. A child with selective mutism remains silent in that specific setting consistently, sometimes for the entire school year, even after becoming familiar with the people and environment. Non-verbal communication still happening. Children with selective mutism often still communicate through nodding, pointing, writing, or whispering to one trusted peer, showing that the block is specifically around spoken words in that setting, not a general unwillingness to interact. The contrast between settings is stark. A shy child is usually quieter across most unfamiliar settings to some degree. A child with selective mutism is often fully expressive, talkative, and even loud at home, but completely silent in another specific environment — a contrast that is often the biggest clue something more than shyness is happening. It doesn’t resolve with typical reassurance. Shy children generally become more comfortable with gentle encouragement and time. A child with selective mutism often remains silent in the triggering setting no matter how much time passes or how kindly they are encouraged, because the anxiety response, not willpower, is driving the silence. Signs of Selective Mutism Speaks freely at home but is silent at school or in public. This is the hallmark sign — full verbal ability and comfort in one environment, complete silence in another. Freezes, avoids eye contact, or appears blank when spoken to in the triggering setting. Rather than simply not responding, the child may appear physically frozen, look away, or seem unable to process the question at all. Communicates through gestures, writing, or whispering instead of speaking aloud. Many children find alternative ways to communicate their needs without using their voice in the setting where they feel unable to speak. Anxiety symptoms around the triggering setting. Stomach aches, resistance to attending school, clinginess to a parent at drop-off, or visible distress before entering the setting where mutism occurs. The pattern persists for at least a month beyond the first month of school. Since some silence in the very first weeks of a new school year is common for many children, clinicians typically look for the pattern to continue consistently beyond that initial settling-in period before considering selective mutism. Difficulty with other social interactions, even non-verbal ones, in the triggering setting. Some children with selective mutism also avoid eye contact, physical proximity, or even nodding/shaking their head in the setting where anxiety is highest, though this varies from child to child. What Causes Selective Mutism? Selective mutism is understood primarily as an anxiety-based condition, closely related to social anxiety, rather than a behavioural choice, defiance, or trauma response in most cases (though past trauma should always be considered and ruled out by a professional). Children with a naturally inhibited or anxious temperament from a young age are more likely to develop selective mutism, and it often runs alongside a broader tendency toward social anxiety or generalised anxiety. Bilingual or multilingual children are sometimes misdiagnosed with selective mutism when the real issue is a language adjustment period — a careful evaluation should distinguish between the two, since the treatment approach differs significantly. In some children, selective mutism can also co-occur with speech or language difficulties, sensory processing differences, or autism spectrum traits, which is why a thorough assessment matters rather than assuming anxiety is the only factor at play. Why Selective Mutism Should Not Be Ignored A common and understandable instinct is to wait and see if a child will “grow out of it,” especially since the child clearly can speak and does so happily at home. However, without support, selective mutism can persist for years, significantly affecting a child’s academic participation, friendships, and self-esteem as the pattern becomes more entrenched with each year it continues unaddressed. Importantly, pressuring, bribing, or punishing a child to speak almost never works and typically increases anxiety further, since the silence is driven by a genuine anxiety response rather than stubbornness. Early, gentle, professionally guided intervention has a strong track record of helping children speak comfortably across settings — the earlier it’s addressed, the more responsive children tend to be to treatment. Treatment Options for Selective Mutism Behavioral therapy with a gradual exposure approach. The most well-supported treatment
Read More
AAC augmentative and alternative communication

AAC (Augmentative and Alternative Communication): When and How to Introduce It

By Nivera Child Development Centre | Kumbalam, Kochi, Kerala Reviewed by our child development specialists and an Speech Therapist, Physiotherapist | Updated 10 September  2026 For parents of a child who is non-verbal or has very limited spoken language, the idea of introducing a picture board or a communication device can feel like giving up on speech altogether. It’s one of the most common fears we hear at our centre — and it’s also one of the most persistent myths in speech therapy. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, or AAC, does not replace a child’s chance to speak. In most cases, it actively supports and accelerates it. This guide explains what AAC is, when it should be introduced, the different types available, and how to get started without worry or delay What Is AAC? Augmentative and Alternative Communication refers to any tool or method, beyond natural speech, that helps a person express themselves. “Augmentative” means it adds to whatever speech a child already has, and “alternative” means it provides another way to communicate when speech isn’t yet available or reliable. AAC ranges from very simple, low-tech tools — a laminated picture board, a set of cue cards, sign language — to high-tech speech-generating devices and tablet-based apps that speak words and sentences aloud when a child selects an image or types a word. The right form of AAC depends entirely on the child’s age, motor skills, cognitive profile, and communication goals, which is why a proper assessment by a speech-language pathologist matters before choosing a system. The Biggest Myth: “AAC Will Stop My Child From Talking” This is, by far, the most common concern parents raise, and it is not supported by research or clinical experience. In reality, AAC reduces the frustration a non-verbal or minimally verbal child feels when they cannot express their needs, and this reduced frustration alone often creates more opportunities for speech to develop, not fewer. AAC also models language constantly — every time a child sees a picture paired with a spoken word, or presses a button that says the word aloud, they are receiving repeated language input that supports speech and language development in the background, even before they start speaking themselves. Multiple decades of speech-language research consistently show that AAC does not delay speech, and in many children, it appears to support and even accelerate spoken language development rather than replacing it. When Should AAC Be Introduced? There is no fixed age requirement, and earlier is generally better once a genuine communication gap is identified. Signs that it may be time to explore AAC with a speech-language pathologist include: A child is two years or older and still has very few or no spoken words. Waiting to “see if speech comes on its own” for too long can mean months or years of a child struggling to express basic needs, which increases frustration and can contribute to behavioural challenges. A child understands more than they can say. Many non-verbal or minimally verbal children clearly understand language around them but cannot yet produce it. AAC gives them an outlet to express what they already understand, well before spoken words are reliably available. Frustration, tantrums, or behavioural outbursts are increasing due to communication difficulty. When a child has no reliable way to express wants, needs, or discomfort, frustration often shows up as behaviour. Giving the child an alternative communication method frequently reduces these behaviours significantly. A child has a diagnosis strongly associated with limited verbal speech. Conditions such as autism spectrum disorder, apraxia of speech, cerebral palsy, or certain genetic syndromes are commonly associated with reduced or absent spoken language, and AAC assessment is often recommended proactively rather than as a last resort. Progress in traditional speech therapy has plateaued. If a child has been in speech therapy for some time with limited progress toward functional spoken communication, introducing AAC alongside continued speech therapy can open up communication while speech work continues. Types of AAC Systems Unaided AAC (no external tools). This includes gestures, facial expressions, and formal sign language systems. It requires no equipment and can be introduced very early, though it depends on the communication partner also understanding the signs or gestures used. Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS). A structured, low-tech system where a child exchanges a picture card for a desired item or activity, gradually building up to combining multiple picture cards into simple sentences. PECS is widely used as a starting point for many non-verbal children because it’s simple, portable, and doesn’t require any technology. Picture boards and communication books. Laminated boards or books with categorised pictures (food, activities, feelings, people) that a child points to in order to communicate. These are affordable, easy to customise, and don’t rely on batteries or screens. Speech-generating devices (SGDs) and tablet-based apps. Dedicated devices or tablet apps where a child selects an image, word, or icon, and the device speaks the word or sentence aloud. These range from simple single-button devices to sophisticated apps with thousands of customisable words, often used by older children or those with more complex communication needs. Text-based AAC. For children and older individuals who can read and spell, typing directly into a device that speaks the text aloud offers the most flexible and unrestricted form of communication. How AAC Is Introduced: The Process A speech-language pathologist conducts a full communication assessment. This includes evaluating current communication methods, understanding of language, fine motor skills (important for selecting and using picture cards or devices), vision, and cognitive profile, all of which influence which AAC system will work best. The right system is matched to the child, not the other way around. There is no single “best” AAC system — the right choice depends on the individual child’s motor abilities, learning style, and communication needs. A system that works beautifully for one child may not suit another at all. AAC is modelled constantly by the adults around the child. Rather than only prompting the child to use the system, therapists and parents
Read More

KOCHI, KERALA

©Nivera Child Development Centre. All Rights Reserved.

Open chat
Hello ????
Can we help you?